Post by account_disabled on Jan 8, 2024 9:59:32 GMT
Alitigation administrative and fiscal Constana Court Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section Galati Court Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section as well as the courts within the territorial scope of the Iasi Court of Appeal. . Moreover the Covasna Court considers since Government Ordinance no. does not establish a term in which the contraventional complaint must be substantiated it cannot deprive the violator of the right to invoke grounds of illegality or unfoundedness of the disputed minutes according to art. para. from the normative act in question the court is obliged to verify the legality and validity of the contested minutes.
Administering for this purpose the evidence it deems Country Email List necessary. B. The provisions of art. para. from Government Ordinance no. is interpreted in the sense that the complaint against the report establishing the contravention must be substantiated within days from the date of handing over or communication of the contravention report the sanction that occurs in case of failure to provide reasons for thethis term is forfeiture from the right to invoke aspects of illegality of the minutes apart from those provided by art. of the normative act in question under the penalty of nullity which the court can find ex officio. . It was argued in support of this opinion that the provisions of art. lit. d from the.
Civil Procedure Code according to which any summons request must include the factual and legal reasons on which it is based. . It was also shown that the complaint is the specific way of appeal in contraventional matters available to those who believe that they are injured by means of the minutes and that therefore also in the case of the contraventional complaint the rules of common law are applied as regards regarding the motivation of appeals these rules included in the Civil Procedure Code at art. and.
Administering for this purpose the evidence it deems Country Email List necessary. B. The provisions of art. para. from Government Ordinance no. is interpreted in the sense that the complaint against the report establishing the contravention must be substantiated within days from the date of handing over or communication of the contravention report the sanction that occurs in case of failure to provide reasons for thethis term is forfeiture from the right to invoke aspects of illegality of the minutes apart from those provided by art. of the normative act in question under the penalty of nullity which the court can find ex officio. . It was argued in support of this opinion that the provisions of art. lit. d from the.
Civil Procedure Code according to which any summons request must include the factual and legal reasons on which it is based. . It was also shown that the complaint is the specific way of appeal in contraventional matters available to those who believe that they are injured by means of the minutes and that therefore also in the case of the contraventional complaint the rules of common law are applied as regards regarding the motivation of appeals these rules included in the Civil Procedure Code at art. and.